|
Ivan eremet
THE STRATEGY OF SHIFT
February-March 2002.
View
Strategy of Shift Gallery
Many contemporary constructivist geometry
oriented artists endeavour to transform the elementary unity
of surface and neutrality of geometry into a structure that
enables a certain spontaneity and opens up to intimate experience
while the original rigidity of the chosen position is not
denied.
The
solution offered by Ivan
eremet features an experimental approach, concise
formulation and multi-layered aspects of latent meaning. For
example, in Evening Sign (1988)
he dynamizes inner life in the defined field of a painting
by structural arrangements of triangles, rectangles and squares,
as well as by spontaneous gesture and the sensual character
of colour. Still, eremet
aims further: he strives to make contrast dynamics the moving
force of his research, and energy the trademark of his artistic
expression.
In Top Off
(1989), he formulates this principle using conceptual and
visual clarity of Copernican revolution: by cutting and moving
a solid field and its sign, he suggested a tectonic movement
of the surface toward new possibilities and their mental-emotional
effects. The shift itself, to paraphrase A.Maracic, became
the real theme of his work. In the abstract diagram of geometry
he successfully formulates his thought and defines the mechanics
of its plastic functioning with clarity and compactness that
immediately reveal the state of affairs.
Subsequently,
eremet
employs his principle in various spatial and object arrangements:
section of a monolithic form with counterpointed border profiles,
the black and white interrelation of the superficial area
and the centre. And a slight shift of parts (Gap
Down the Middle, 1990), or the object/box in which
shifting of one of its sides reveals a 'mysterious vacancy'
of its interior, resulting in the suggestive tension of present
absence (Open, 1990).
In his variations on the principle, the
artist oscillates between analytic-structural propositions
(A Shift Before, Behind, 1990-97)
and the mirror image as an extended dimension of the body's
interior (Look at Yourself,
1996). 'eremet creates his paintings and sculptures
by a hand that cannot be replaced by a machine. The part played
by the hand in the creation of his works is particularly obvious
in the way he applies paint on a surface. Under the monochrome
fields we clearly feel unambiguous vibrations of distinct
and numerous brush strokes.' (Z.Makovic).
Constructivist/deconstructivist
impulse expresses itself in the cycle of paintings/objects
(as they are called by the critique for a good reason) where
eremet creates spatial suggestions on the level of surface
by discretely pushing apart or laying above one another structural
units that create caesuras of challenging resonance. Formal
organization of horizontal or vertical arrangements and surface-folds
that arise from level shifts of compositional elements, the
dynamic rhythm of black and white, and tectonic qualities
of the composition characterize space as a 'crack in the universe'
with a surprising balance between material and relation.
Such conceptual-plastic relations in eremet's
work have 'activist' force, which is obvious in paintings/objects.
Through Spacing Towards and
Inside Out in the Centre (1991).
They present an attempt to transgress, to use Robert Morris's
formulation, the aura of power and domination over the viewer
that lies at the heart of abstract expressionism and minimalism.
In that sense, in Towards the Centre
(1989-1997) eremet installs a smaller unit within a
larger one, but keeps it separate. He extracts his effect
from the contrast of constructive overlapping in places of
cuts. In the painting/object Shift
in a Triangle (1992), the cut and the movement of triangle
basis makes the 'fracture of changes' the reason and the purpose
of the plastic organism, the content that tells its own story.
The reality of the work's constitutive elements becomes a
language for direct communication with the viewer.
Sis
serigraphics by Ivan eremet published in the album of
the second edition of Dvogled with six poems by Goran Rem
and foreword by Marijan poljar and Branko Male,
publisher Gallery S, Koprovnica 2000 (co-publisher Horetzky-Atelier
Brane Horvata), present a crystallization of eremet's
operative principle of 'geometry of movements', where information
arises from obviousness of interrelations. eremet subverts
the monolithic plane to establish inspiring configurations
of geometric arrangements that are ruled by the tension of
composing and decomposing, stability and dynamics, part and
the whole, large and small. Using a simple plastic vocabulary
and its energy, the painter has succeeded in 'provoking' the
neutral qualities of geometry and turning it into a moving
force of desire and practice, the place of suggestive legibility
and reception endowed by cultural and emotional charge.
Mladenka olman
t} |